<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 10 new laws of Cyberspace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.alianzo.com/socialnetworks/2009/01/08/the-10-new-laws-of-cyberspace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.alianzo.com/socialnetworks/2009/01/08/the-10-new-laws-of-cyberspace/</link>
	<description>Alianzo's blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:16:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: In the social networking business there is no place for second players - Social Networks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.alianzo.com/socialnetworks/2009/01/08/the-10-new-laws-of-cyberspace/comment-page-1/#comment-4475</link>
		<dc:creator>In the social networking business there is no place for second players - Social Networks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 11:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.alianzo.com/socialnetworks/?p=971#comment-4475</guid>
		<description>[...] by Malaysian company MOL Global for, according to TechCrunch, $26.4 million. This price shows that, because of Metcalfe&#8217;s law, in social networking only the largest companies can stay. This means that the market is already [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Malaysian company MOL Global for, according to TechCrunch, $26.4 million. This price shows that, because of Metcalfe&#8217;s law, in social networking only the largest companies can stay. This means that the market is already [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose A. del Moral</title>
		<link>http://blogs.alianzo.com/socialnetworks/2009/01/08/the-10-new-laws-of-cyberspace/comment-page-1/#comment-4344</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose A. del Moral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.alianzo.com/socialnetworks/?p=971#comment-4344</guid>
		<description>No reference so far ;-) I made it out.
I don&#039;t think that crowdsourcing is necessarily an active action. I think it can also be a passive one. It&#039;s actually what Google does with his algorithm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No reference so far <img src='http://blogs.alianzo.com/socialnetworks/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  I made it out.<br />
I don&#8217;t think that crowdsourcing is necessarily an active action. I think it can also be a passive one. It&#8217;s actually what Google does with his algorithm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ujjawal Bagaria</title>
		<link>http://blogs.alianzo.com/socialnetworks/2009/01/08/the-10-new-laws-of-cyberspace/comment-page-1/#comment-4343</link>
		<dc:creator>Ujjawal Bagaria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.alianzo.com/socialnetworks/?p=971#comment-4343</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Thanks for your reply. I agree with you but crowd sourcing means people contributing towards a particular thing instead of we extracting the info from them. My basic question is can we apply both of these laws in an online business and derive some benefits out of them. 

Also is there any reference of the 11th law i.e. Wikipedia&#039;s law. Can we verify it??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Thanks for your reply. I agree with you but crowd sourcing means people contributing towards a particular thing instead of we extracting the info from them. My basic question is can we apply both of these laws in an online business and derive some benefits out of them. </p>
<p>Also is there any reference of the 11th law i.e. Wikipedia&#8217;s law. Can we verify it??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose A. del Moral</title>
		<link>http://blogs.alianzo.com/socialnetworks/2009/01/08/the-10-new-laws-of-cyberspace/comment-page-1/#comment-4342</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose A. del Moral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.alianzo.com/socialnetworks/?p=971#comment-4342</guid>
		<description>Not necessarily. You can extract lots of info from passive users. For example, where you click, how much time you spend on a site, which site do you visit the most...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not necessarily. You can extract lots of info from passive users. For example, where you click, how much time you spend on a site, which site do you visit the most&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ujjawal Bagaria</title>
		<link>http://blogs.alianzo.com/socialnetworks/2009/01/08/the-10-new-laws-of-cyberspace/comment-page-1/#comment-4341</link>
		<dc:creator>Ujjawal Bagaria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.alianzo.com/socialnetworks/?p=971#comment-4341</guid>
		<description>Hi Jose,

Nice compilation of Cyberspace laws. Well dont u think that Crowdsourcing law and Nielsen&#039;s law of 1/9 are contradictory to each other. One says that the better the size of crowd the better the result and other says that only the top 1% always contributes to the online content. So if the same top 1% contributes always then how can u have crowd sourcing?? I would be very thankful to you if you can provide your thoughts on this....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jose,</p>
<p>Nice compilation of Cyberspace laws. Well dont u think that Crowdsourcing law and Nielsen&#8217;s law of 1/9 are contradictory to each other. One says that the better the size of crowd the better the result and other says that only the top 1% always contributes to the online content. So if the same top 1% contributes always then how can u have crowd sourcing?? I would be very thankful to you if you can provide your thoughts on this&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Álvaro Andoin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.alianzo.com/socialnetworks/2009/01/08/the-10-new-laws-of-cyberspace/comment-page-1/#comment-3908</link>
		<dc:creator>Álvaro Andoin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.alianzo.com/socialnetworks/?p=971#comment-3908</guid>
		<description>Hi Jose,

Thanks for this interesting recap of laws of social network theories. Some of them you mention, 80-20 law for instance, could be aggregated in what is also refered as a Power Law distribution. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_law fore more info.

Regards and keep rockin´
Álvaro</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jose,</p>
<p>Thanks for this interesting recap of laws of social network theories. Some of them you mention, 80-20 law for instance, could be aggregated in what is also refered as a Power Law distribution. See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_law" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_law</a> fore more info.</p>
<p>Regards and keep rockin´<br />
Álvaro</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
